|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Location: Alberta Government Home > FOIP Home > Resources > Publications > Guide to Identifying Personal Information Banks | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Print Version
Guide to Identifying Personal Information Banks
Revised April 2004 PDF Version (pdf)
The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIP Act) requires all public bodies to make a directory that lists the public body’s personal information banks (PIBs) available to the public for inspection and copying. The purpose of making this information available is to help the public know what personal information the public body might have about them as individuals. The requirement for a public body to produce a directory of its PIBs is set out in section 87.1 of the Act. This section was created when the FOIP Amendment Act, 2003 was passed in May 2003. It is the result of recommendations contained in the November 2002 report of an all-party Select Special Committee that was appointed by the Legislative Assembly to review the FOIP Act. Section 87.1 replaces provisions for directories of personal information banks previously set out mainly in section 87 of the Act (which is repealed and replaced by sections 87 and 87.1). Section 87.1 significantly changes the requirements for all public bodies. The directory is no longer the responsibility of the Minister of Service Alberta. Instead, the head of the public body is responsible for maintaining and publishing a directory of its PIBS, which may be in either printed or electronic form. In addition, the required content of the directory of PIBs held by public bodies (which was previously more extensive for provincial government public bodies) is made the same for all public bodies. The directory must include:
As a consequence of the transfer of responsibility to the head of the public body, the Act no longer requires the head to notify the Minister of Service Alberta of a use or disclosure for a purpose different from that listed in the directory. Section 87.1(3) requires this information to be recorded, and either attached or linked to the personal information in question, and the purpose must be included in the next update to the directory. Section 87.1(4) requires the head of a public body to ensure that the directory is kept as current as is practical. For more information about the amendments, see FOIP Bulletin No. 14 - FOIP Amendment Act, 2003 available at www.foip.gov.ab.ca.
The following discussion of personal information banks is intended as a guide for FOIP Coordinators in public bodies. The purpose is to assist the Coordinator with:
The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act defines "personal information banks" as:
The definition of a PIB has three key components:
To determine whether a collection of information should be identified as a personal information bank, you should first ask yourself the following three questions: 1. Is the information "personal" according to the Act?The Act includes a description of the most common types of personal information (section 1(n)). "Personal information" means recorded information about an identifiable individual, including:
This list is not exhaustive. Rather, it includes common types of information that is considered personal. Any information that can be associated with a specific individual would also be considered personal information. 2. Does the "personal information" take the form of a "collection"?The Oxford English Dictionary defines collection as "a group of things collected together, especially systematically." In the context of records containing personal information, the number of records should not be the criteria. Here are some general types of "collections" that illustrate the range of collections of personal information that may support operations of your organization:
A collection can also include records in multiple media, such as pictures, audiotapes, videotapes, print and electronic media. 3. Is the collection of personal information organized or retrievable by the name of an individual or by an identifying number, symbol or other particular assigned to an individual?In practice, this means the information has to be organized or retrievable by name, health card number, driver’s license number, student identification number, or some other unique identifier. In many cases, client files are organized by client number or the name of the client. These files are both organized and retrievable from filing cabinets by the unique identifier (i.e. client number or client name) and would be considered a personal information bank. For example, a database of registrants for a training program that contains a person’s name and telephone number, where each number is associated with a specific name, is both "organized" and "retrievable" by the person’s name and is considered a PIB. Another example might be a list of "sign-in" sheets at secure buildings. These lists often include the names of individuals and the time the person enters and exits the building. While the list is not in alphabetical order, it is organized by name (as a column on the sheet). Most electronic databases can be searched by any data field, including name or an identification number. In some electronic databases, personal information is incidental or not the main purpose of the database. For example, an inventory of computer equipment will list manufacturers, model numbers, peripherals, software, warranties, etc. It may also include the computer user’s name. Such a database is not required to be listed as a personal information bank. Figure 1 below is a decision chart that can help you identify personal information banks in your organization. Figure 1 - Identifying personal information banks
For each of the personal information banks that you identify, you will have to provide the following information in your list of personal information banks:
33 "No personal information may be collected by or for a public body unless
In most cases, there will be a specific Act or regulation that authorizes the collection of personal information (e.g. the School Act, Post-secondary Learning Act, Hospitals Act, Regional Health Authorities Act, Municipal Government Act, Police Act). For example, if the records are part of a program, you will want to cite the authority for the program, as long as the Act or its subordinate legislation "expressly authorizes" the collection of personal information. You only need to provide the title of the Act and/or regulation. In cases where there is not an Act of Alberta or Canada that expressly allows for the collection of personal information, section 33(c) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act may allow for the collection of the personal information. As noted above, however, the information must relate directly to and be necessary for an operating program of the public body. If this is the case, you may list the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act as the legal authority for collecting the personal information contained in the personal information bank. In these cases, please cite section 33(c) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. If multiple Acts can be cited as legal authorities for collecting the personal information, you should list every Act. If your public body is maintaining PIBs for which historical records have already been sent to the Provincial Archives of Alberta or another archives, you, as well as the Archives, will continue to list the PIBs. In these cases, you should consult with the Archives to ensure that the PIB is described consistently by both the Archives and your public body. If you have any questions, or need help identifying a PIB, please contact Access, Privacy and Security of Service Alberta.
1. What if you take a portion of information from an existing PIB, such as a database, and export it to a new database or file?Anytime you export data and form a new collection of data, it is a new PIB providing it meets all other criteria. Often, a new collection of personal information will be created as the result of data matching agreements within a public body, with other public bodies or with other levels of government. In these cases, a new PIB should be identified and information reported on it. Example #1 is one such case. Example #1 Children's Services is implementing a new program – the Child Health Benefit. The ministry is creating a new database containing the names and other personal information about people eligible for the program. This database will be created by “matching” information from existing PIBs at Children's Services and Education as well as information from other sources. The result of the match is maintained as a separate collection. In this case, the result of the match is a new PIB. 2. Does the source of the information affect its status as a PIB? For example, if a list of names and phone numbers are in the "public domain" (e.g. a telephone book), can we exclude them from being a PIB?Since the Act does not discuss source as part of the definition, the source of the information does not affect its status as "personal information" or a PIB. For example, you can collect names, addresses and phone numbers for a group of people from a number of different public telephone directories, association directories or other sources. Even though the information is available elsewhere, once you have collected the personal information onto a list or into a database, it is a new PIB as long as it meets all three of the conditions discussed earlier. While this sounds like a straightforward practice, it is not a trivial concern. Many members of the public are very sensitive about the use of their telephone numbers in lists to be used for promotional or other purposes despite the fact that their phone numbers are already in the telephone book. Example #2 shows how a collection of contact names and mailing addresses to support program delivery is reported as a personal information bank. Example #2 Alberta Environment keeps a mailing list of environmental education practitioners. The records include the names and addresses of individuals. The records clearly contain personal information, are maintained as a collection, and the information is organized in a way that personal information is retrievable by the person’s name or address. Here is how the ministry could identify the PIB for the directory.
*The Government Organization Act should only be used as an authority where no other more specific authority exists. For more information on legal authority, see page 6. 3. What if the public body has similar collections of information, used in the same way, but located in a number of different offices? Is it one PIB or a number of separate PIBs?If the information is identical, and there are simply copies in different locations, it can be listed as one PIB. If the information forms part of a general collection, even if it is physically located in different offices, you can also treat the information as one PIB. However, all of the locations where this information is kept must still be reported, as in Example #3. Example #3 Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation maintains information about the Adopt-a-Highway Program. The information includes names of applicants and participants. The records clearly contain personal information, are maintained as a collection, and the information is organized in a way that personal information is retrievable by the person’s name or address. The information is located in multiple offices – District Offices, the Program Services Branch and Regional Offices. Here is this PIB could be described in the directory.
4. If information is maintained in a single collection, but the legal authority is different for different components of the collection, is it one PIB or multiple PIBs?If the collection that maintains personal information is a single collection, it can be considered a single PIB, regardless of the number of Acts or legal authorities that may provide authority for parts of the collection. However, all of the legal authorities must be cited. Example #4 is one such case because the information is maintained as a single collection in the ministry’s Vital Statistics (VISTAS) database. Example #4 Alberta Registries of Service Alberta maintains vital statistic records. There is a wide range of personal information in the collection, and the personal information is retrievable by a person’s name. While the information is maintained as a single collection, the authority to collect the information is based on a number of Acts. Here is how this PIB could be described in the directory.
5. When would a public body have "personal information" that would not be considered a PIB?Many public bodies have files that may contain "personal information" such as names, addresses, and phone numbers, but which are not organized or searchable by a personal identifier. Because these collections do not meet all three criteria discussed earlier, they are not PIBs. For example, there might be a collection of paper files containing research results that include a contact person. The files are organized by the ten individual research studies, and are not searchable by the contact’s name. This would not be considered a PIB, although there is "personal information" maintained which must be safeguarded as personal information. Sometimes, personal information in paper records is not considered a PIB because the information is neither organized nor retrievable by the individual’s name or other unique identifier. However, if the information has been entered into a computer system, it may become retrievable by an individual’s name or unique identifier. In these cases, the electronic collection of information may be considered a personal information bank. An example of this is illustrated in Example #5. Example #5 Alberta Finance manages the collection of taxes and certain receivables on behalf of the province. As part of the administration of the Hotel Room Tax, tax returns are stored in paper records and organized by the name of the hotel filing the tax return. While the collection of records (i.e., files) contains the personal information (for example, the names, address, financial information of hotel owners), the collection of personal information is not organized or retrievable by an individual’s unique identifier. Thus, the paper records of the tax returns are not a PIB. However, certain information in the tax return, including the names and financial information of hotel owners, is entered into a computer system. While information in the paper files is not organized by individual or retrievable by an individual’s name or identifier, the computer system allows for a search, by individual, of hotel properties owned in the province. In this case, the paper records would not be considered a PIB. However, the computer database is considered a PIB because the personal information is retrievable by an individual’s name. Please note that the public bodies and PIBs cited in the above examples are for illustrative purposes only. For current information about a public body's personal information banks, contact the public body's FOIP Coordinator. Contact information is available on the FOIP web site at http://www.foip.gov.ab.ca/pbdirectory. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||